Thursday, September 29, 2016

CSIT 155: Week4A - Target Market



Hello again Friends!

For this weeks’ discussion we are addressing target markets, which is just like gold when running or managing an online business. Believe it or not, some businesses have a particular target audience, yet have to tailor that information based on the analytics received from following data patterns regarding those audiences. 

For example: my father’s business was designed to reach audiences with pets who were in a need of a method to keep them warm in the cold months of the year. What we discovered from the analytics was: we were receiving audiences of pet advocates, audiences of people who travel frequently with pets, audiences of people who care for pets they do not own (such as strays), and finally, middle-aged women who enjoy looking at pictures of pets. 

For the two sites I have selected for the purpose of this discussion are: 

Cheap Diapers | Baby Diapers | Wholesale Diapers – Just Cheap Diapers: http://www.justcheapdiapers.com/
 
Chili’s Grill & Bar Restaurant – Chili’s: http://www.chilis.com/EN/pages/home.aspx
 
(*Chili’s web address, despite being updated, was still incorrect. The address I have posted above is the address which will take you to the Chili’s page being identified in this post.)

First off, let me say that both of these sites, although simple, were fantastic, in my opinion, and touched my heart-strings one way or the other. The images selected and the simplicity of design were excellent choices by the developers and were very directive towards the advertised products.
The target market for the “Just Diapers” site was obviously that of parents, or those who wish to offer gifts to parents of small children. So, when making the audience as broad as possible, you would need to address someone with children of “diaper age” or, someone who knows someone with children of “diaper age”. Funny how that works.

The target market for the “Chili’s” site would imaginably be anyone that would eat food. Despite whether or not the audience member visits restaurants frequently (or ever), the goal of the site was to peak an interest in anyone who likes food, and their vivid images and mouth-watering descriptions could get hermits to leave their shell and eat there.
Ironically, these two sites would likely conflict one another, as the primary audience for “Just Diapers” (with small children at home) probably don’t often eat out. 

The obvious differences between the two websites that stand out right away, of course, were one was of food and beverage, and the other for infants, babies and children. The navigation was generally the same for both these sites, with a top navigation bar, clear to see when arriving to the page. The images featured on the homepage of both of these sites were meant to grab attention and obviously took some skill to achieve – both sites provided excellent, vivid imagery that would appeal to the desired audiences.  

I don’t know if there are any subtle differences between these two sites, as they are both pretty clear about purpose and intent. I certainly think there is crossover, as people with children still eat food and people who eat food potentially could have children,  however, the biggest audience crossover would be offering “Kids’ Meals” and “Party Platters” on the Chili’s menu, encouraging those patrons with children to attend one of their many locations. To be honest, I think they could have done better with the encouragement, however, but I assume that people going to Chili’s aren’t just looking to see what they can feed their kids, and that is likely the cheapest (most inexpensive) item collection on the menu, which any restaurant would want to steer clear from.

As I mentioned earlier, I believe both of these sites were designed very well, and I was pleased with the results, as I fall into both categories of intended audience regarding these products. 

Thank you for reading!
 
Cheers!

JennL.

Monday, September 26, 2016

CSIT 155: Week3B - Aesthetics, Design & Branding



Hi again friends!

There are many websites I frequent during the week, and they are primarily related to work or school, but for the sake of an interesting discussion, the two websites I visit frequently are:



I know, I must seem like a crazy shopper, but I have reasons outside of shopping to visit these two sites.  As you may have noticed from my previous posts, I maintain the digital aspect of my father’s budding business “Sharon’s Cozy Pets”, and therefore must keep an eye on these two sites for proper advertising and promotion techniques. 

Why are these sites effective?
Well, to be totally honest, these two sites serve a very specific purpose, and through design and ease-of-access, they complete their function in a clear and understandable manner, while still having a certain aesthetic value that is easy on the eyes. 

What specific principles of a good design do they include and why?
The specific principles of both of these sites are: their organization. Although one is obviously more advanced than the other when it comes to website development, they both serve the same function, and that’s exciting. The purpose of these sites are to entertain and create sales, and the easier it is to do that for an audience, the greater the outcome.

What makes you come back again?
These particular sites both have a certain “heroin-content” in the department of sales, and promote the audience to come back again and again to avoid missing something they may want for a better price in which it is normally posted for. For example: Amazon offers products of all types, and despite their prices fluctuating with those that interact in the sales department of this site, Amazon offers “lightening sales” and “flash sales” where products normally priced at X dollars, is temporarily marked down to Y dollars, but only for a limited time. The viewers of this site are eager not to miss such sales, but must visit frequently and view the contents of the site to participate.

What could be improved?
To be completely honest, I don’t see anything from these two particular sites I would improve – I have always admired their design, their way to attract and maintain audiences, and their aesthetic construction. Personally, every aspect I see of these two sites I find pleasing, and outside of employees/staff maintaining the site and the different departments (such as billing and customer service) there is nothing I would change about the site itself, or the way it functions.

Thanks for reading!

Cheers!

JennL.

Thursday, September 22, 2016

CSIT 155: Week3A - Aesthetics, Design and Branding



Hello Again Friends,

I am a total sucker for aesthetics, and when I see something that has potential, but simply doesn’t reach the distance it deserves, it drives me nuts. The two sites I selected for this discussion blog are:
Spot Metering (Spot Meter): Digital / 35mm / Medium Format! 

 
The Riverside Art Center:


To begin the total destruction of these sites (as if I were the perfect web designer) my first reaction was to that of busy, busy, overactive, overwhelming materials. Both of these sites offer an overly elaborate collection of links to learn details about every aspect of the business/service offered through the site. 

Keeping in mind, the average internet user can decide in seconds whether or not they will further investigate a site or leave it in internet limbo, well, forever. Sadly, I think both of these sites would have been in the latter for most causal internet surfers, and I’m happy inside to know these pages get so many views due to this particular assignment. Imagine! Knowing every couple of months, your site randomly receives an extra 100+ visits and you may never know why! HA!

Okay, well, the next thing I immediately noticed upon adding these URL’s to my address bar was the lack of title for the Riverside Art Center, to be added on the tab of the open browser page, simply stating “Home” as any novice web designer would write. The other site, Spot Metering, seemed to have an overly elaborate title, mentioning the business twice and then film or camera shutter measurements, which may not be recognized by all audiences. Also, and it could be a personal thing, but this designer has elected to display the Japanese flag as his favicon, and I’m hoping it is due to his own cultural background, rather than selecting an image he felt described his business. 

I guess there’s a particular taste, or style that accompanies a web site that potentially could be recognized and make it big, but neither of these sites have that appeal. I’m not exactly sure what the magic is, and I’m sure I’ll learn before this class has ended, but I can say that neither of these sites have reached that level of trendy beauty. I do believe, however, the Spot Metering site is likely more prepared to arrive at that level, with some work and adjustments, but is still a distance away.

Some things that could use changing on both sites:

Enormous navigational panes – both of these designers should learn to condense information, and although I admire their motivation to make dozens and dozens of web pages, the general visitor is there to find what they want and leave. It is rare there is someone there to address every navigational aspect of the website, therefore wasting the time (and perhaps money, depending on host size limits) of the developer.

Bland colors on one / busy background on other – despite their obvious intention to get attention where it belonged, these sites have elected to do the exact opposite of what they are designed to do. The site that displays photography (Spot Metering) has used an elaborate, decorative site background, font style, and navigational skin which takes away from what the site is intended for: photography. A simple background and basic text will allow the true art to be noticed on this site, if the user wants a touch of personalization, there are many other ways he can incorporate that without taking away from his photographs.  On the other hand, the site designated for art is bland and misleading, and almost immediately asks you to buy something as soon as you arrive. This site should reflect all the art and beauty this center produces, keeping the user’s eyes full with magic and wonder. 

Neither of these sites appropriately indicate their date of construction, or maintenance, and therefore cannot be considered modern sites by the standard of the internet, however, there are updates made to the site that indicate particular dates and times that inform the user there was activity recently and likely will be in the future.  

To be honest, it is difficult to critique a site, especially if you have a few of your own floating about online. The difference between my critique and what I have done in the past is: I’m certainly taking notes this time around, to avoid sending any of my material on the fast train to Internet Limbo.



The two sites I selected for positive discussion are:
 Apple: 

Headhunter Hairstyling Tanning and Nails:


As opposed to my two previously discussed websites, these two are fantastically made, well organized, aesthetically pleasing, easy to navigate and balanced. Both of these sites offer a beautiful collection of professional images reflecting the products and services available with a type of glamor that sells.

Just as discussed in my previous post, the average internet user immediately decides if they are attracted to a website, and as an “average user” I can say I was immediately attracted to both of these sites. I adored the images selected for the galleries, and the photographers that contributed were very talented. The navigation of both sites were fantastic and easy to understand for the most novice to more experienced users.

The Apple site, as it was expected to be, was miraculous, offering links in a well-organized fashion, leading the viewer to practically any aspect of what the site and Apple, as a company offers. There was little of the site I didn’t like: the colors were perfectly selected, the font and navigation was balanced and attractive – it was an all-around a great success, but do we expect any less?

The Headhunter Hairstyling site has a wonderful array of images, cleverly scrolling on the homepage, inviting the potential customers to see their competency first-hand. Besides the incredibly wonderful name for a hairstylist, the site portrays the incredible skills of the team in a bright and inviting template with well-organized navigational links and aesthetically pleasing font selection.

Thanks for reading!

Cheers!

JennL.

********************************************
I attempted to read Laira Ellis’ blog this week, for comments, and discovered her privacy settings have been changed, and I am unable to access the content without an invite. Sorry, Laira.

I also attempted to visit David Hurt's blog to discover there was some input issues and nothing to comment on. Sorry, David.

I Commented on:
 
Kylee Grice

Thanks for reading!

Cheers!

JennL.